Vox nutrition review4/12/2023 ![]() ![]() They all acknowledged that she was tapping into a real problem, one that’s been difficult for their community to address. The reporter interviewed researchers who work in food and nutrition about all this. Studies that were funded by beverage companies were four to eight times more likely to come to favorable conclusions about the health effects of those beverages. Studies funded by soda makers, by contrast, are less likely to find such correlations. Or take this investigation of 206 publications on the health effects of milk, soft drinks, and fruit juices. Independently funded studies tend to find a correlation between soda consumption and poor health outcomes. Take this review of studies on sugary drinks. And other research backs up Nestle’s findings. ![]() Whereas other fields, like medicine, have been putting in place safeguards to protect against undue industry influence, the field of nutrition has lagged behind in this regard. Many nutrition researchers have been complaining about conflict-of-interest problems in their field for some time now. “It was so obvious”…But Nestle is not the first to notice this problem. ![]() “Without any trouble, I could identify industry-funded nutrition studies by their titles,” says the New York University professor. About a year ago, Marion Nestle finally got sick of the rotten state of nutrition science.Įverywhere she looked, she found glaring conflicts of interest. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |